Skip to content

Our work

Business systems in daily use, delivered in days and weeks.

Each of these systems cut manual work and errors, and gave managers a clear view of the business. Smartible's founder delivered them all, with AI doing most of the building. We work the same way on every project.

Case studies

Case 01 · Smartible

Our own client platform, built in about 2 days

Built in about 2 days

The problem
We needed one secure place for every client project: the problem, the plan, prices, approvals, signed agreements, risks and progress, with a permanent record of who did what.
What was built
A client portal and staff system with guided forms, agreements signed online and saved as PDFs, risk and decision logs, safe file uploads and a record of every change. Nearly 200 automatic checks test it.
What changed
Now in final testing before we use it on client projects. A traditional team would need about 5 months and A$265,000 to A$475,000 to build the same thing.

Our estimate for a traditional team, building from the same agreed plan: about 380 to 450 working days of design, development, testing, setup and project management for a system of the same size and quality (about 11,700 lines of code and 193 automatic tests), at Brisbane contractor rates of A$700 to A$1,050 a day.

Case 02 · Quality

Quality records in one place, working in a day

Working in a day

The problem
Quality issues, corrective actions and audits were tracked across spreadsheets and email, with controlled documents kept somewhere else again.
What was built
One system to log quality problems, track the fixes, plan audits and show compliance. Managers get a live overview. Documents stay in the tools staff already use.
What changed
It is used every day. Every quality record is in one place, managers see the current state at a glance, and auditors get a clear trail.

Case 03 · Manufacturing

A reliable production schedule every day, without the manual juggling

Live in about seven and a half weeks

The problem
An electronics manufacturer planned production by hand, balancing staff availability, stock, supplier deliveries, machine maintenance and multi-step jobs.
What was built
A scheduling system that draws on live business data, works out the best schedule each day and shows the whole floor on one screen.
What changed
95% scheduling reliability and one clear picture of production. Live in about seven and a half weeks, when the traditional estimate was 6 to 12 months.

Case 04 · Manufacturing

Production data entered once, used everywhere

Live in under a week

The problem
Setup times, job times and quantities were written down or remembered, then typed in again later, which led to errors.
What was built
A simple clock-in and job tracking tool for the shop floor, connected to the scheduling system and the main business system.
What changed
Live tracking from day one, with no typing the same information twice.

Case 05 · Finance

Two days of senior staff time back, every reporting period

Ready in hours to days

The problem
Customer invoices were not matching the accounts, and finding the gaps took about two days of senior staff time each reporting period.
What was built
A small tool that checks every invoice against the accounts automatically, and can be rerun each period.
What changed
Invoices now match the accounts with 100% accuracy. The fault in the business system that caused the gaps was found and confirmed, and processes were changed. About two days of senior staff time are freed up each period.

Case 06 · New product

An economic analysis product, built from scratch

Launched

The problem
Large investors, such as pension funds, wanted a daily read on economic conditions in each major economy.
What was built
An online product that gathers economic data, sorts six major economies by their current conditions and shows the results on a dashboard.
What changed
Launched and running.

Case 07 · New product

An online breed registry, built from scratch

Launched

The problem
Breeders and breed societies needed an affordable online system for their records, members and listings.
What was built
A subscription service that many organisations can use at once, each with their own records.
What changed
Running as a free-to-start subscription service, with family trees, breeding calculations, a marketplace and membership management.

What they have in common

Each one started with an experienced engineer sitting down with the people who dealt with the problem every day, then a written plan. AI did much of the building, but people decided what to build, how it fitted with existing systems and when it was ready. If you have a similar problem, we would be glad to talk it through.

Next step

Have a similar challenge?

Scheduling, quality records, shop-floor data, month-end account checks or a new product. We would be happy to talk it through on a free 30-minute call.